MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2537820306 · doi:10.1109/ipecon.2010.5697074

Protective device problems and solutions

2010· article· en· W2537820306 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2010 Conference Proceedings IPEC · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrical Fault Detection and Protection
Canadian institutionsBGC Engineering (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComparatorCircuit breakerScheme (mathematics)Computer scienceCurrent (fluid)Electronic engineeringReliability engineeringRisk analysis (engineering)Electrical engineeringControl engineeringEngineeringMathematicsVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new approach to the protective philosophy in electrical distribution systems is suggested as an alternative to existing methods. Fast circuit breakers with a new protective logic are described and analyzed. The use of the combination of a rate-of-change of current and comparator channels is a possible solution to coordination and protection problems. The suggested protection scheme appears very promising and effective. It could be used for all essential feeders and, in general, when all other possible solutions fail. This solution, if it evolves into an industrial standard, could become an inexpensive ultimate protective arrangement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.554
Threshold uncertainty score0.614

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it