MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2537859388 · doi:10.1002/cjce.22727

Removal of Cr (VI) from aqueous solutions by titanate nanomaterials synthesized via hydrothermal method

2016· article· en· W2537859388 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Gongduan Fan, Rujing Lin, Zhaoyue Su, Xiuyong Lin, Xu Renxing, Wei Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAdsorptionAqueous solutionHydrothermal circulationLangmuir adsorption modelNanomaterialsChemical engineeringSpecific surface areaExothermic reactionMonoclinic crystal systemAbsorption (acoustics)ChemistryMaterials scienceBET theoryInorganic chemistryNuclear chemistryNanotechnologyCatalysisPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistryCrystal structureComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Titanate nanomaterials (TNs) were synthesized via a simple hydrothermal method. The physical‐chemical properties of the as‐prepared TNs, such as morphology, structure, surface area, and chemical composition, were characterized by XRD, SEM, and BET. The absorption capability and adsorptive mechanism of Cr (VI) in aqueous solutions were tested in the static system. The results showed that the TNs prepared with reaction time of 24 h were in pure monoclinic phase which aggregated mutually to form a unique layered structure. TNs were considered excellent adsorbents to Cr (VI). When pH = 1, the adsorption capacity was up to 83.91 mg/g. The adsorption kinetics of Cr (VI) followed the pseudo‐first order model. The equilibrium adsorption time of TNs was 80 min. The Langmuir isotherm model fitted the equilibrium data best. The adsorption of Cr (VI) onto TNs was an exothermic process, and the adsorption process was mainly composed of electrostatic attraction. The structure of TNs basically remained unchanged after adsorption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalFrench-language works237,207