Gene Therapy and Stem Cell Therapy to Improve the Outcome of Human Islet Transplantation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since its first introduction in 1990s, the Edmonton Protocol for human islet transplantation has helped more than 500 patients with type 1 diabetes worldwide and met great success from bench to bedside.The Edmonton Protocol involves isolating islets from a cadaveric donor pancreas by enzymatic digestion and infusing into the patient's portal vein.Each recipient usually receives islets from two or three donors for an optimal outcome and is dosed with two immunosuppressive drugs, sirolimus and tacrolimus and a monoclonal antibody drug daclizumab to prevent the graft rejection.However, despite the administration of immunosuppressive drugs and the recent improvement in islet isolation, preparation and transplantation, insulin independence is rarely sustained for long term after islet transplantation.It was reported that by a year after transplant, 50-68% of patients do not need to receive additional insulin, but by five years after the procedure, few than 10% of total patients are free of daily insulin injection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".