MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2537919653 · doi:10.1109/icm.2007.4497688

A 90nm CMOS multimode image sensor intended for a visual cortical stimulator

2007· article· en· W2537919653 on OpenAlexafffund
Roula Ghannoum, Mohamad Sawan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsCMC Microsystems
KeywordsComparatorPixelCMOSComputer scienceImage sensorDynamic rangeLogarithmComputer visionComputer hardwareCapacitorElectronic engineeringArtificial intelligenceVoltageElectrical engineeringEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present in this paper a variable resolution multimode digital pixel sensor (DPS). Each pixel comprises a switched-capacitor comparator with a regenerative 8-bit memory. Two supply voltages, 2.5V and IV, are used to maximize the dynamic range (DR) of the sensor. The proposed DPS has three modes of operation: linear with the option of multiple exposures, logarithmic for extended dynamic range, and high-speed differential mode for the subtraction of two consecutive images. Intended for the front-end of a visual cortical stimulator aiming at restoring sight to the blind, the proposed circuit, which encompasses a matrix of 64×48 pixels, allows acquiring images at a rate higher than 400 frames per second (fps). Implemented in a 90nm CMOS technology, each pixel has an area of 9μm times 9μm and a fill factor of 26%. A DR of up to 83 dB is obtained when the DPS is operated in its logarithmic mode.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCCD and CMOS Imaging SensorsFrench-language works237,207