MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2537955716

Public space and violence in young people experiencing homelessness

2006· article· en· W2537955716 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tim Bryar

Bibliographic record

VenueParity · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHomelessness and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)CriminologyPublic healthPopulationPublic spaceSuicide preventionOccupational safety and healthPoison controlInjury preventionPsychologySociologyMedicineDemographyEnvironmental healthGeographyNursing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Non fatal injuries resulting from violence against young people is a critical public health issue. A survey published in 2001 by the Australian Institute of Criminology, Young Australians and Domestic Violence, found that up to one-quarter of the 5000 young people aged 12 to 20 from all states and territories surveyed between 1998-99 had witnessed violent acts. Gaetz (2004), estimates that street youth are five times as likely as youth living in a secure environment to report being victims of violence as children. In 2004- 2005, soft tissue injuries, often resulting from violence, were the second most common presentation at the Young People's Health Service, indicating significant levels of violent behaviour within this population group. The persistent public focus on street youth as potential offenders overlooks the real possibility that they can often be the victims of violence (Gaetz, 2004).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueParitySame topicHomelessness and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207