MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2538045079 · doi:10.1109/warsd.2003.1295204

Operational segmentation and classification of SAR sea ice imagery

2004· article· en· W2538045079 on OpenAlexafffundabout
David A. Clausi, Huawu Deng

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Space Agency
KeywordsSegmentationSynthetic aperture radarArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceComputer visionImage segmentationRadar imagingFeature extractionPixelFeature (linguistics)Image textureRemote sensingGeologyRadarTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Canadian Ice Service (CIS) is a government agency responsible for monitoring ice-infested regions in Canada's jurisdiction. Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) is the primary tool used for monitoring such vast, inaccessible regions. Ice maps of different regions are generated each day in support of navigation operations and environmental assessments. Currently, operators digitally segment the SAR data manually using primarily tone and texture visual characteristics. Regions containing multiple ice types are identified, however, it is not feasible to produce a pixel-based segmentation due to time constraints. In this research, advanced methods for performing texture feature extraction, incorporating tonal features, and performing the segmentation are presented. Examples of the segmentation of a SAR image that is difficult to segment manually and that requires the inclusion of both tone and texture features are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.181
Threshold uncertainty score0.902

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2004
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207