MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2538167768 · doi:10.29173/alr451

Alberta's Statutory Privacy Regime and its Impact on the Workplace

2016· article· en· W2538167768 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Sandra M. Anderson

Bibliographic record

VenueAlberta Law Review · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCriminal Law and Evidence
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStatutory lawStatuteLegislationPersonally identifiable informationBusinessInformation privacyInternet privacyPrivacy policyLabour lawPrivacy lawPublic relationsLawPolitical scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The author describes the tension created by the new privacy legislation between the individual values of personal privacy and the common values of the workplace. There is a detailed discussion of the respective obligations of employers and employees to protect and make accessible personal records held by the employer. The article focuses on various types of employee information, including health information, and discusses in what circumstances they can be disclosed to an employer. Next, the developing impact of the privacy statutes on labour law is surveyed, specifically the rights of unions to obtain employees' personal information. Then the author examines the extent of employee personal information the employer is entitled to have and in what circumstances by surveying three controversial areas: video and other surveillance, drug and alcohol testing and electronic monitoring in the workplace. She concludes that privacy legislation is having a major impact on rights and relationships between employers and employees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.933
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlberta Law ReviewSame topicCriminal Law and EvidenceFrench-language works237,207