MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2538206522 · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2016.06.190

IC‐P‐159: Voxel‐Wise Logistic Regression Improves Prediction Accuracy for Developing AD

2016· article· en· W2538206522 on OpenAlexaff
Sulantha Mathotaarachchi, Tharick A. Pascoal, Monica Shin, Andréa Lessa Benedet, Min Su Kang, Thomas Beaudry, Vladimir Fonov, Serge Gauthier, Aurélie Labbe, Pedro Rosa‐Neto

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicBrain Tumor Detection and Classification
Canadian institutionsMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalDouglas CollegeDouglas Mental Health University InstituteMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecuneusVoxelRandom forestLogistic regressionPopulationSuperior frontal gyrusArtificial intelligenceTemporal cortexMedicinePsychologyComputer scienceMachine learningNeuroscienceFunctional magnetic resonance imaging

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Predicting clinical trajectories in populations at risk, permit enrich populations for disease modifying clinical trials. Recent developments in machine learning techniques have enabled us to achieve highly accurate predictions in multiple clinical applications. Here we demonstrate a novel data driven method to improve the accuracy of a Random Forest based classifier to predict the development of dementia. [18F]Florbetapir images were acquired for 275 MCI individuals from the ADNI cohort and the images were processed using an established PET image processing pipeline. Regional SUVr values were extracted from brain regions such as the Angular Gyrus, Supramarginal Gyrus, Posterior Cingulate Cortex and Precuneus which were identified to have a significant amyloid accumulation based on existing literature. 70%(192) and 30% of the population were labeled as the training set and the testing set, respectively. Data driven method included a Voxel-wise logistic regression analysis using the training population to identify anatomically significant brain regions with highest odds-ratios (ORs) to develop dementia. Two Random Forest based predictors were trained with the regional SUVr values based on literature and the data driven method respectively. Their performances were measured against the testing population. Voxel-wise logistic regression analysis indicated that brain regions including Orbitofrontal Cortex, Mid Frontal Sulci, Mid Temporal Sulci, Temporal Occipital junction, PCC, Angular Gyrus, Precuneus, Putamen and the Nucleus Accumbens have the highest OR values for a unit SD increase of [18F]Florbetapir [Figure 1]. The Random Forest predictor trained using regions based on literature achieved 79% and 78% as validation and testing accuracy (0.89 AUC) while the predictor based on the data driven method achieved 84% for both validation and testing accuracy (0.91 AUC). The Temporal Occipital junction, Mid Temporal Sulci and Mid Frontal Sulci regions indicated the highest contribution in predicting the development of dementia [Figure 2]. The data driven method using Voxel-wise logistic regression analysis have increased the accuracy of the Random Forest predictor and have outperforms the methods developed in previously published literature and can be a utilized as a valuable clinical framework. Regions with the highest OR values. Orbitofrontal Cortex, Mid Frontal Sulci, Mid Temporal Sulci, Temporal Occipital junction, PCC, Angular Gyrus, Precuneus, Putamen and the Nucleus Accumbens are indicated. ROC curves and features importance for the two predictors. a) predictor with the regions based on existing literature b) predictor based on Voxel-wise logistic regression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.798
Threshold uncertainty score0.544

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicBrain Tumor Detection and ClassificationFrench-language works237,207