MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2538207652 · doi:10.11159/ijepr.2016.003

Chitosan — A Natural Sorbent for Copper Ions

2016· article· en· W2538207652 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Simona Schwarz, Mandy Mende, Dana Schwarz

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Pollution and Remediation · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSorbentChitosanCopperNatural (archaeology)IonChemistryMaterials scienceChemical engineeringMetallurgyAdsorptionOrganic chemistryGeologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a result of industrial activities and technological changes, a high and continuously increasing amount of heavy metals and heavy metal containing effluents are released into the environment by different industrial nations. These metals cannot be degraded. Furthermore, because of their toxicity, they are highly detrimental to the environment and human health. Heavy metals accumulate in the food chain and become permanent pollutants in the environment. In the human body they accumulate in different organs causing serious damage. To overcome this problem, the sorption behaviour of heavy metal ions, in particular copper ions was investigated by apply chitosan flakes, powder, and beads as a natural adsorbent. Metal removal was studied using adsorbance measurements, SEM-EDX, and size measurements. The sorption capacity of chitosan was determined at different concentration and times. The received sorption capacities for copper ions were very promising, with a maximum value of 150 mg/g on chitosan powder.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.193

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Environmental Pollution and RemediationSame topicNanocomposite Films for Food PackagingFrench-language works237,207