MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2538218795 · doi:10.1109/milcom.1990.117409

Multipactor breakdown and passive intermodulation in microwave equipment for stellite applications

2002· article· en· W2538218795 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrical Contact Performance and Analysis
Canadian institutionsCOM DEV International
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntermodulationMicrowaveSatelliteElectrical engineeringComputer sciencePower (physics)Electronic circuitCommunications satelliteElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineeringAerospace engineeringPhysicsBandwidth (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The phenomena of multiplication and passive intermodulation (PIM) as applied to passive microwave equipment for satellite applications is addressed. A brief summary of PIM and ways to prevent it are given. High-power measured data for a range of microwave equipment and subsystems is included. The measured power levels represent the state-of-the-art for high-power output circuits required for communications and remote-sensing satellites. A discussion on the subject of design margins in specifying high-power equipment for space applications is given. The most cost-effective approach to protect against multipaction breakdown and passive intermodulation is to force a set of guidelines to be followed at all stages of a satellite program. A summary of these guidelines is included.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score0.223

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it