MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2538401751 · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aa6510

Bianchi IX cosmologies and the golden ratio

2017· article· en· W2538401751 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueClassical and Quantum Gravity · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Theories and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsEinsteinWainwrightCurvatureSeries (stratigraphy)LogarithmGolden ratioEinstein equationsEinstein field equations

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Special solutions to the Einstein equations in the asymptotic limit for the Bianchi IX cosmologies in the vacuum are examined using Ellis–MacCallum–Wainwright (‘expansion-normalized’) variables. Using an iterative map (the B-map) obeyed by two of the dynamical variables (the normalized shear components) in the ‘asymptotic regime’ close to the cosmological singularity, two period 3 solutions are constructed. These are the simplest of an infinite number of periodic solutions and represent the transition from one vacuum Bianchi I Kasner solution to another. It is shown that the full 3-cycle solutions for the remaining variables (the logarithms of the normalized curvatures) generate a set of self-similar golden rectangles in a graphical time series representation of their dynamics as the normalized time parameter is run backwards towards the initial singularity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.143
Threshold uncertainty score0.607

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it