MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2538412732 · doi:10.1109/nssmic.2007.4436772

Fast 3D image reconstruction method based on SVD decomposition of a block-circulant system matrix

2007· article· en· W2538412732 on OpenAlexaff
Jean‐Daniel Leroux, Vitali Selivanov, Réjean Fontaine, Roger Lecomte

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSingular value decompositionIterative reconstructionCirculant matrixMatrix decompositionProjection (relational algebra)Matrix (chemical analysis)Computer visionComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceAlgorithmMathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose an ultra-fast 3D image reconstruction method based on singular value decomposition (SVD) of a block-circulant system matrix obtained from a cylindrical image representation. PET and SPECT image reconstruction based on SVD of the system matrix has already been demonstrated previously but was limited to the reconstruction of small 2D images due to the difficulty of inverting an ill-conditioned large matrix. In this work, this difficulty is overcome by using a Fourier transformed factorization of the block-circulant matrix to accelerate the SVD decomposition procedure and make it more robust. The Fourier transform is further used to accelerate the matrix-vector operations between the system matrix pseudo-inverse and the projection data resulting in an extremely fast direct image reconstruction method. A maximum acceleration of the method is achieved by taking advantage of all in-plane and axial symmetries between the tubes of response through the use of a 3D cylindrical image representation preserving all symmetries in the system matrix. Using the same projection data, the proposed method delivers images of visual quality comparable to FBP, but 25 times faster. Moreover, for imaging systems with many symmetries, the method is so fast that it can produce higher quality images using all available 3D projection data, taking time comparable to FBP or MLEM, the latter using single plane, i.e. partial 2D projection data only. The new method is therefore ideal for real time 3D image reconstruction allowing for the instant visualization of the image estimate while the patient is being scanned.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMedical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207