Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tbis chapter describes an analytical framework for the design and/or analysis of baffles to reduce floatables discharges from combined-sewer overflows (CSOs). This simple analytical framework, which is supported with a spreadsheet model, is compared to its predecessors and its advantages illustrated. These include ease of use, improved applicability to typical installation configurations, and refmed analyses of floatables-removalmechanisms. Refined analyses include a simple accounting for flow path through a chamberincluding a provision for situations where the invert of the inlet conduit is at a higher elevation than the bottom of the baffle -and a simple accounting for floatables captme via the underflow (dry-weather connection) during overflow conditions. Results of the model are compared to the results of the previous approaches and to available laboratory test data for four test cases. Examples of the model application to cases in the City ofNew York are available from the author. Finally, possible areas for future improvement in the model approach are identified.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it