MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2538482373 · doi:10.1109/rissp.2003.1285655

An improved self-organizing map approach to traveling salesman problem

2004· article· en· W2538482373 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Algorithms and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTravelling salesman problem2-optBottleneck traveling salesman problemComputer scienceTraveling purchaser problemMathematical optimizationSelf-organizing mapMotion planningExtension (predicate logic)Christofides algorithmRobotAlgorithmArtificial neural networkMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, an improved self-organizing map approach to solving the traveling salesman problem is proposed by fixing the number of nodes in the output layer of neural network, modifying the neighborhood function, and modifying the weight update rules. An overview of previous work on solving the traveling salesman problem is given. An extension of the proposed algorithm can also be used to solve multiple traveling salesman problems and robot path planning. The simulation results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm is capable of providing a better solution within a reasonable time and much faster than conventional self-organizing map algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.442
Threshold uncertainty score0.496

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Algorithms and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207