MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2538610431 · doi:10.1130/abs/2016am-278210

NATURAL RESOURCES CANADA INDUCED SEISMICITY RESEARCH PROJECT: AN UPDATE

2016· article· en· W2538610431 on OpenAlexaffabout
Honn Kao, Denis Lavoie, Maurice Lamontagne, J. F. Cassidy

Bibliographic record

VenueAbstracts with programs - Geological Society of America · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInvertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
Canadian institutionsSt. Lawrence CollegeGovernment of Northwest TerritoriesGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInduced seismicityNatural (archaeology)Natural resourceGeologyComputer scienceSeismologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development of unconventional oil and gas in North America has caused a significant increase of seismicity in areas of intense hydraulic fracturing and wastewater injection operations.These induced earthquakes have attracted considerable attention due to their potential seismic hazards.In 2012, Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) initiated the Induced Seismicity Research (ISR) Activity as part of the Shale Gas Research Project (Environmental Geoscience Program) to investigate the possible relationship between hydraulic fracturing (HF) of shale gas and the changing pattern of local seismicity.In 2015 the activity was expanded to include studies of all injection-related seismic events.The primary objective of NRCan's ISR Project is to identify and fill critical knowledge gaps on the seismogenesis of induced earthquakes.Another important goal of ISR is to enhance regulatory performance by providing observation-based science and advice.NRCan's ISR Project has three major tasks: 1) improve real-time earthquakemonitoring capability in major shale gas basins where current seismic coverage is sparse; 2) establish the baseline (pre-development) regional seismicity pattern for places where unconventional oil and gas is deemed likely to be developed in the near future.; and 3) conduct targeted studies on significant induced events to understand the relationship between their seismogenesis and man-made operations.Working closely with provincial and territorial governments, new real-time broadband seismograph stations have been installed in British Columbia (BC), Alberta (AB), New Brunswick (NB), Northwest Territories (NT), Quebec (QC), and Yukon Territory (YT).Studies of seismicity before, during, and after HF operations have been completed for the Horn River Basin in northeast BC, the Moncton and Sussex areas in southern NB, and the Norman Wells area of the central MacKenzie Valley, NT.Similar studies, with the addition of an InSAR component, are planned for the Montney play of BC and the Fox Creek area of AB.Detailed studies into recent M>4 events in BC and AB are currently underway (including the Mw4.6 Montney earthquake of August 17, 2015) examing source processes and ground motions to better understand the causes of induced seismicity and potential hazards. Unconventional Oil and Gas in Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.157
Threshold uncertainty score0.316

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0160.021
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0060.003
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAbstracts with programs - Geological Society of AmericaSame topicInvertebrate Taxonomy and EcologyFrench-language works237,207