MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2538618992 · doi:10.1002/cjce.22724

Development of CAMD based on the hybrid gene algorithm and simulated annealing algorithm and the application on solvent selection

2016· article· en· W2538618992 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicProcess Optimization and Integration
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsSimulated annealingAlgorithmRanking (information retrieval)Computer scienceAdaptive simulated annealingEvolutionary algorithmAnnealing (glass)Selection (genetic algorithm)SolventHybrid algorithm (constraint satisfaction)Fitness functionGenetic algorithmMaterials scienceChemistryArtificial intelligenceMachine learningOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper, an evolutionary approach, improved CAMD based on the hybrid gene algorithm and simulated annealing algorithm (GASA), is developed. The new approach combines the feature of GA and SA, avoiding the problem of prematurity. With a new category strategy of candidate groups from the Mod UNIFAC group database adopted, a repair operator is introduced to guarantee the integrity of randomly generated molecules and thus the search of straight chain alkane as well as cyclane solutions can be performed together. The properties of molecules are obtained by the group contribution method. An example of extractive solvent selection for a methanol‐methyl acetate system has been illustrated in detail to further explain the method. The stability as well as other properties of the molecules which the authors think important is considered in the fitness function. Results of the example show that the fitness ranking values are better than those in the literature. The CAMD method in this paper can be used in practical chemical processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.829
Threshold uncertainty score0.180

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.173
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it