MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2538681537

Tackling Social Isolation and Loneliness in Community Exercise Programs for Seniors

2016· article· en· W2538681537 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Jiyoung Hwang, Lisa Wang, Charlotte Jones

Bibliographic record

VenueUBC Faculty of Medicine medical journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhysical Activity and Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLonelinessSocial isolationSocializationIsolation (microbiology)RecreationGerontologyPsychologyMedicineSocial psychologyPolitical sciencePsychiatry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Social isolation is a growing problem in Canadian seniors. Social isolation and loneliness are related to negative health effects and increased morbidity and mortality. The majority of senior recreation programs and studies surrounding them focus on physical benefits, while ignoring the effects of the programs on social isolation and loneliness. Furthermore, not many community programs in Canada currently incorporate socialization sessions into exercise programs. This article attempts to highlight studies that focus on tackling the issue of social isolation and loneliness in traditional community senior exercise programs and the potential role of sustained socialization-based exercise programs on improving senior’s health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.965
Threshold uncertainty score0.360

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUBC Faculty of Medicine medical journalSame topicPhysical Activity and HealthFrench-language works237,207