Numerical simulation of heat transfer in a micro-cavity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The behaviour of rarefied monatomic gas of Maxwell particles within a rectangular enclosure is investigated, with the Navier–Stokes and Fourier field of equations with first- (NSF) and second-order boundary conditions (NSF2) of the velocity slip and temperature jump, and the regularized 13 moments approach (R13). The enclosure considered has a heated bottom with lateral walls that have specular reflection. The effect of the three dimensionless parameters characterizing the simulated problem, the cavity aspect ratio, the Knudsen number, and the temperature ratio of the hot over the cold walls, on the flow and bulk quantities is examined. For the small Knudsen numbers the flow presents one type of streamlines from the cold to hot plate in both NSF and R13 theories, while by increasing the Knudsen number the flow becomes more complex and presents hot to cold flow streamlines in the extended approach of R13. These rarefaction effects cannot be predicted by the classical continuum approach of NSF. The increase of the temperature ratio in R13 affects the hot to cold flow, which begins to vanish, while this type of streamline does not appear by decreasing the aspect ratio.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".