MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2538877198 · doi:10.1115/ipc2000-174

Computer Simulations of Low Concentrations Slurry Flows in Pipelines

2000· article· en· W2538877198 on OpenAlexaff
Yuri Leonenko, Oleg Vinogradov

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGranular flow and fluidized beds
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaminar flowTurbulenceMechanicsSlurryFlow (mathematics)Fluid dynamicsPlanarPipeline transportPipe flowFlow velocityOpen-channel flowParticle (ecology)HomogeneousPhysicsGeologyStatistical physicsEngineeringThermodynamicsComputer scienceMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the paper a discrete system of particles carried by fluid is considered in a planar motion. The volumetric density of particles is taken between 1% and 2% so that they can be treated within the framework of a discrete dynamics model. The fluid is then considered as a carrier of particles. The Landau-Lifshitz concept of turbulence is used to describe the fluctuating part of fluid velocity. This approach is applied to simulate different regimes (laminar and turbulent) and various states of particle motion (moving bed, heterogeneous flow, and homogeneous flow) using only two parameters, which have to be determined experimentally. These two parameters, found for a particular pipe and for a particular velocity from a simple experiment, then have been used for simulations of flow for other pipe diameters and different velocities. The results agree favorably with experimental observations of the type of slurry flow and critical velocities identifying transitions from one type to another.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGranular flow and fluidized bedsFrench-language works237,207