MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2538890584 · doi:10.1176/appi.pn.2016.10b1

Free WPA Curriculum Available on Intimate Partner, Sexual Violence

2016· article· en· W2538890584 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mark Moran

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychiatric News · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSex and Gender in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumSexual violenceDomestic violenceMental healthMedical educationSexual abusePsychiatryMedicinePsychologySuicide preventionPoison controlNursingPedagogyMedical emergency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Back to table of contents Previous article Next article Professional NewsFull AccessFree WPA Curriculum Available on Intimate Partner, Sexual ViolenceMark MoranMark MoranSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:17 Oct 2016https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.pn.2016.10b1AbstractThe curriculum is designed for training medical students, psychiatrists in residency programs, and practicing psychiatrists, with increasing levels of competency at each level.A new competency-based curriculum focusing on intimate partner violence and sexual violence against women, issued by the World Psychiatric Association (WPA), seeks to educate medical students, trainees, and practicing psychiatrists about interviewing, assessing, and treating women victims of intimate partner or sexual violence. The WPA’s International Competency-Based Curriculum for Mental Health Care Providers on Intimate Partner Violence/Sexual Violence Against Women, issued in July, is a 55-page document freely accessible on the WPA website. It outlines a wide range of teaching tools—didactic material, PowerPoint slides, case vignettes, and videos. “We owe it to our trainees to help them be up to speed on inter-viewing, assessing, and treating women exposed to intimate partner violence and sexual violence.” —Donna Stewart, M.D.The curriculum was developed by a steering committee of the WPA Section on Women’s Mental Health. Donna Stewart, M.D., co-chair of the committee and University Professor and chair of Women’s Health at the University of Toronto, said that psychiatric educators are welcome to use the resources in whole or in part with attribution.In an interview with Psychiatric News, Stewart said research indicates that few women who experience abuse or violence ever tell a health professional, and few physicians ask about intimate partner or sexual victimization. She said that’s true in mental health settings as well. The major barriers offered by psychiatrists for failing to discuss intimate partner or sexual violence include lack of adequate training about how to ask or respond, lack of knowledge regarding prevalence, skepticism about treatment effectiveness, concern about legal involvement, uncertainty about appropriate referrals, physician discomfort with the issues, time constraints, fear of offending or losing patients, and fear of safety for the women or oneself. “Worldwide the prevalence of intimate partner violence is at least 30 percent,” Stewart continued. “And we know that intimate partner violence and sexual violence dramatically affect mental health.” She added that while it is recognized that men can be victims of intimate partner violence, it is women who are disproportionately on the receiving end of such violence and tend to suffer greater injury.The curriculum is built around observable “competencies”—similar to the core competencies set by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education—that should be mastered in successive stages. The nine competencies described in the curriculum, each of which is divided into subtopics, require learners to be able to do the following: Define physical, psychological, and sexual intimate partner violence. Discuss prevalence.Be aware of myths and preconceptions.Have knowledge of sequelae. Assess for presence in a clinical setting.Provide psychological first aid.Have knowledge of resources.Communicate and document details of assessment.Manage violence-related psychological trauma.The curriculum offers five forms of resources. These include the World Health Organization’s Guidance on Health for Women subjected to intimate partner violence or sexual violence; links and abstracts of key papers, books, manual, and toolkits; a number of PowerPoint slides on intimate partner and sexual violence; case vignettes and teaching points; and video-based learning vignettes accessible on YouTube.One case vignette, for instance, is on “Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder After Sexual Violence (or Intimate Partner Violence)”: A family doctor refers a 25-year-old woman who was raped six months ago by an ex-partner to a community psychiatrist for intrusive memories of the assault, distressing dreams, flashbacks, avoidance of being alone, sadness, anxiety, trouble concentrating, hypervigilance, and inability to work. The woman was previously well and has no psychiatric history. The vignette is accompanied by teaching points about diagnosis, the range of treatment options, and documentation. Stewart said that the WPA’s Section on Women’s Mental Health began work on the curriculum three years ago, when the steering committee was selected from international leaders with expertise in intimate partner violence and sexual violence. It was cited as a priority by WPA President Dineesh Buhgra, M.D., Ph.D., of the United Kingdom. The co-chair of the curriculum steering committee is Prabha Chandra, M.D., professor and chair of the Department of Psychiatry at the National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences in Bangalore, India. Past APA President Michelle Riba, M.D., a member of the WPA Section on Women’s Mental Health and secretary of scientific publications for the WPA, said the curriculum is being disseminated at psychiatric meetings around the world, including APA’s, and a number of universities and training programs have already begun using it. The curriculum is accompanied by the Position Statement on Intimate Partner Violence and Sexual Violence Against Women, also issued in July, that declares the WPA’s support for public and professional awareness of violence against women as a critical women’s mental health determinant and for research to develop and evaluate the best treatments for women who have been victimized. “As many as 30 percent of our female patients will have experienced intimate partner violence, so we owe it to our trainees to help them be up to speed on interviewing, assessing, and treating women exposed to intimate partner violence and sexual violence,” Stewart said. “And practicing psychiatrists owe it to themselves and their patients to be current as well.” ■The International Competency-Based Curriculum for Mental Health Care Providers on Intimate Partner Violence/Sexual Violence Against Women can be accessed here. The WPA Position Statement on Intimate Partner Violence and Sexual Violence Against Women is available here. ISSUES NewArchived

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.442
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsychiatric NewsSame topicSex and Gender in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207