MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W25389231

Hydro-demolition on Canadian highway tunnel

2010· article· en· W25389231 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stefan Hilmersson

Bibliographic record

VenueCONCRETE · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTunneling and Rock Mechanics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemolitionHammerEngineeringWork zoneTransport engineeringWork (physics)Civil engineeringMarine engineeringMechanical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydro-demolition techniques are being used for the refurbishment contract on Montreal's highway 720 Ville Marie tunnel following the delivery of a new Aquajet HVD Evolution robot to main contractor GTS. Hydro-demolition removes weakened concrete but leaves undamaged material intact. Computerised control plays a key role in the performance quality and design of hydro-demolition equipment, allowing the machines to carry out repetitive tasks automatically. In the Ville Marie Tunnel, approximately 1km of concrete on both sides of the Eastern portals of the tunnel requires replacement and reinforcement. Electrical and telecommunications cables will also be replaced, and fibre optics and improved lighting will also be installed. Operating in live traffic conditions with very heavy traffic flows and working at heights of up to 15m, it was essential that the contractor protected both its workforce and passing traffic from falling debris. As a result the robot is installed behind a protected frame and positioned on a telescopic handler for ease of access for the extended height operations. The Aquajet removed damaged concrete at the speed of several hydraulic jackhammers and more than 25-fold faster than hand-held hammers. Hydro-demolition also eliminates the risk of vibration damage to personnel, complying with European work practices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.671
Threshold uncertainty score0.631

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCONCRETESame topicTunneling and Rock MechanicsFrench-language works237,207