MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2538940062 · doi:10.1109/jlt.2016.2619159

A Microwave Photonic Signal Processor for Arbitrary Microwave Waveform Generation and Pulse Compression

2016· article· en· W2538940062 on OpenAlexafffund
Jiejun Zhang, Jianping Yao

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Lightwave Technology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Photonic Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsPulse compressionWaveformMicrowavePhotonicsMicrowave engineeringSignal processingOpticsSIGNAL (programming language)Pulse shapingElectronic engineeringMicrowave transmissionPulse (music)Arbitrary waveform generatorOptoelectronicsMaterials scienceComputer sciencePhysicsTelecommunicationsEngineeringDigital signal processingRadarLaser

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A microwave photonic signal processor for arbitrary microwave waveform generation and pulse compression based on a microwave photonic filter (MPF) and a time reversal module (TRM) is proposed and experimentally demonstrated. In the proposed signal processor, an arbitrary microwave waveform is generated by allowing an ultrashort microwave pulse to pass through an MPF and a TRM, to get a microwave waveform to have a spectrum that is the complex conjugate of the spectral response of the MPF. When the generated microwave waveform is transmitted and received, by passing the received microwave waveform through the same MPF, matched filtering is performed and the microwave waveform is compressed. The proposed microwave photonic signal processor is verified by two experiments, in which a linearly chirped microwave waveform (LCMW) with a bandwidth of 7.7 GHz and a 7-bit phase-coded microwave waveform (PCMW) with a carrier frequency of 4.08 GHz are generated and compressed. The temporal durations of the generated LCMW and PCMW are 5.57 and 5.4 ns, respectively, and the widths of the compressed pulses are 0.27 and 0.58 ns, corresponding to pulse compression ratios of 20.6 and 9.3, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Lightwave TechnologySame topicAdvanced Photonic Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207