MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2538949213 · doi:10.1109/ultsym.2010.5935537

Design of a phased-array for radiation force generation following a closed path

2010· article· en· W2538949213 on OpenAlexaff
Didace Ekeom, Anis Hadj Henni, Guy Cloutier

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUltrasound Imaging and Elastography
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcousticsTransducerPhased arrayBeamformingAcoustic radiation forceAcoustic radiationElectromagnetic acoustic transducerPhysicsOpticsRadiationUltrasonic sensorEngineeringElectronic engineeringUltrasoundElectrical engineeringAntenna (radio)Ultrasonic testing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work demonstrates with numerical simulations, the feasibility of an ultrasound probe for the generation of radiation forces in set of points following a path surrounding a tumor. Such strategy is adapted to induce resonance elastography of breast tumors and/or to increase displacement magnitudes induced by low frequency shear waves. Transducer elements were based on 1-3 piezocomposite material. 3D simulations combining the finite element method and boundary element method with periodic boundary conditions in the elevation direction were used to predict acoustic wave radiation in the breast. The crosstalk between neighbor elements was not taken into account. The coupling factor of the piezocomposite material and the radiated power of the transducer were optimized. The transducer electrical impedance was targeted to 50 Ω. The final probe was simulated by assembling the designed transducer to build an octagonal phased-array, with 256 elements on each edge. Using dynamic transmitter beamforming techniques, the electrical excitation that generates the radiation force along a path and resulting acoustic pattern in the breast were evaluated. Transducers central frequency was 4.5 MHz; they were able to deliver enough power and could generate the radiation force with a relatively low level of voltage excitation. Magnitude and orientation of the acoustic intensity (radiation force) at any point of a path were controlled.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUltrasound Imaging and ElastographyFrench-language works237,207