Bibliographic record
Abstract
Parmi les journaux comiques les plus en vue du xixe siècle, l’hebdomadaire Tintamarre occupe une place de choix. Ses fers de lance, Jean-Louis Commerson et Eugène Vachette, s’adjoignent les services imaginaires de l’écrivain de papier Joseph Citrouillard, qui va rapidement se révéler l’un des contributeurs les plus fidèles du Tintamarre et le sujet de nombreux articles. C’est, dès lors, une double logique sérielle qui se développe autour de Citrouillard, à la fois canular auctorial et antihéros populaire. Cet article interroge les implications et les effets de cette double casquette fantaisiste en ce qui concerne la logique interne du journal et le développement en son sein d’une poétique parodique spécifique, mais également en matière d’institutionnalisation d’une forme de mystification littéraire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".