MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2539107019 · doi:10.1109/wssc.2010.5730264

Collateral damage risk: Quantifying the water surface bullet ricochet problem

2010· article· en· W2539107019 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMilitary Defense Systems Analysis
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProjectileCollateral damageComputer scienceSurface (topology)EngineeringMarine engineeringForensic engineeringMaterials scienceMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bullet ricochet from the sea surface presents a problem for naval operators working in near-shore environments because it provides a significant but poorly constrained collateral damage risk. This paper presents results of ricochet experiments for five military projectiles. The experiments were carried out in a laboratory environment where a flat-water surface was ensured, but an approach to consider wavy surfaces is used to extend the results to consider simple wave fields. Computer-generated witness plates marking the post-ricochet flight path confirm operator concerns that ricochet of military projectiles from the water surface are unpredictable. This result underlines the need for alternative deterrence and classification capabilities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.435
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMilitary Defense Systems AnalysisFrench-language works237,207