SCHON, Karl-Georg, Die Capitula Angilramni. Eine prozessrechtliche Fälschung Pseudoisidors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Plusieurs chercheurs de l'institut des Monumenta Germaniae Historica de Munich ont entrepris depuis quelque temps le travail ardu de publication des textes pseudoisidoriens dont l'édition de référence était encore il y a peu celle que procura Hinschius en 1863.Les faux pseudo-isidoriens, bien connus depuis le monumental travail de Horst Fuhrmann, désignent quatre collections : les Fausses décrétales, la collection Hispana d'Autun, le faux capitulaire de Benoît Lévite et le faux capitulaire d'Angilramnus, évêque de Metz ( † 791).Tous ces textes proviennent d'un même cercle de faussairesd'un « atelier », a-t-on désormais l'habitude de dire -que l'on a longtemps pensé actif dans la province ecclésiastique de Reims entre 847 et 852 mais dont les travaux de Klaus Zechiel-Eckes ont récemment précisé qu'il avait pu travailler au monastère de Corbie un peu plus tôt, dès les années 830, sous la houlette de Paschase Radbert, futur abbé de l'établissement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".