MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2539425665

Science-Fiction et Alterite

2009· article· en· W2539425665 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Claire Cornillon

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian review of comparative literature · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse multidisciplinary academic research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtWonderEthnologyPhilosophySociology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On a souvent parle de sense of wonder pour decrire l’effet de la science-fiction sur le lecteur mais si ces ecrivains sont toujours a la recherche d’idees originales qui surprendront les lecteurs les plus chevronnes, habitues au depaysement devenu banal du vaisseau spatial et du paradoxe temporel, ce n’est pas tant pour les emerveiller par l’ampleur de leur imagination que pour les amener a s’emerveiller devant leur propre monde. Il s’agit de rester toujours en mouvement, d’interroger sans cesse, sans jamais imposer une reponse, explorer l’inconnu mais surtout ce qui semble connu, rester toujours eveille.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.008
Science and technology studies0.0080.037
Scholarly communication0.0100.007
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.451
Teacher spread0.380 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian review of comparative literatureSame topicDiverse multidisciplinary academic researchFrench-language works237,207