Studying viscosity of asphalt binders and effect of varied production temperatures on engineering properties of hot mix asphalt mixtures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objectives of this paper are studying the viscosity characteristics of asphalt binders containing different additives, ethylene vinyl acetate, polypropylene, and hydrated lime, and the influence of varying mixing and compaction temperatures on the engineering properties of the corresponding mixtures. The engineering properties of the asphalt mixtures were investigated using the indirect tensile strength, moisture damage evaluation, and volumetric properties (in terms of the air void content). Based on the viscosity results, the non-Newtonian behavior of the asphalt binders prevails with the increase in the concentration of polymers and hydrated lime, thus the setting of the production temperatures using the equiviscous principle would be expected to be rather inaccurate. The variation in the production temperatures affected the engineering properties of the asphalt mixtures. It is recommended that a revision of the production temperatures from different methods be undertaken to satisfy the desired engineering properties for different conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".