MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Between-species patterns of covariation in plant size, seed size and fecundity in monocarpic herbs

2001· article· en· W2539514800 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueEcoscience · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsFecundityBiologyEcologyAllometryBotanyZoologyPopulationDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Covariation in plant mass, seed mass and fecundity was investigated for 15 species of monocarpic herbs (annuals and biennials) harvested at final developmental stage from recently disturbed habitats. Above-ground vegetative mass and fecundity varied by over three orders of magnitude and seed mass varied by over two orders of magnitude across species. Eighty-eight percent of the variation in fecundity across species was explained by covariation in the other two characters as predictor variables in a least squares regression model; fecundity increased significantly and proportionately with increasing above-ground vegetative mass but decreased significantly and proportionately with increasing individual seed mass. Individual seed mass and above-ground vegetative mass were positively correlated across species when fecundity was held constant under partial correlation. The results indicate that none of the relationships between these characters are size-dependent, i.e., the traditional trade-off, predicted by life history theory, between seed size and fecundity is isometric across species, as is the increase in both fecundity and total seed mass with increasing vegetative mass. Allometric (size-dependent) relationships for these characters have been reported in previous studies where developmental stage was not controlled across species; the detection of isometric relationships in the present study may therefore be a consequence of measuring whole-genet, lifetime fecundity and above-ground vegetative mass for all study species. A general hypothesis is presented for the interpretation of covariation in plant size, seed size and fecundity across species in which the principal selection mechanism involves ‘time limitation’. The amount of time available for growth (before density-independent mortality, e.g., from disturbance) selects for the level of precocity necessary to reproduce before death. This affects the level of constraint on maximum attainable plant size, i.e., smaller when shorter-lived. This, in turn, affects reproductive output, which can be greater when longer-lived, expressed as greater fecundity and/or larger seed size. However, both cannot be maximized because of the inherent trade-off between seed size and fecundity for plants of a given size.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.847

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it