Bibliographic record
Abstract
本研究通过对茄科植物的E8基因的非编码区DNA序列进行亲缘关系及功能元件保守性分析,发现E8基因的非编码区包含ERE,茉莉酸和低温干旱应答等基序并存在较高的保守性,表明利用果实特异性E8启动子改善同属茄科茄属的人参果果实风味更具特异性;利用密码子偏爱性优化设计甜蛋白Brazzein,采用亚克隆技术成功获得甜蛋白des-pGlu1-Brazzein基因和E8启动子基因,经Blast对比均与GenBank中已报道的序列高度同源,并利用2KGQ模型分析des-pGlu1-Brazzein基因的空间结构特性;以中间载体pHANNIBAL及植物表达载体pCEPSP为基础,分别构建由E8启动子及35S启动子驱动的兼具重组甜蛋白及除草剂抗性的植物表达载体,并通过农杆菌介导法进行人参果的遗传转化,获得转化再生植株54株,经检测从中筛选出15株阳性植株,初步确定已经完成目的基因整合到人参果基因组中。
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".