MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2540267167

La Cuestión del Género en Ciencias Sociales y en Psicología Social

2016· article· es· W2540267167 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Víctor Eduardo Márquez Duarte

Bibliographic record

VenueTrayectorias: revista de ciencias sociales de la Universidad Nacional de Nuevo León · 2016
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyGender relationsPhilosophyGender studies
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

espanolEl genero es sin duda uno de los mas importantes conceptos en ciencias sociales, se refiere a un sistema complejo de relaciones humanas que toma como unidad de investigacion la interaccion entre dos grupos, hombres y mujeres. Historicamente, el concepto y mas tarde la teoria de genero facilitan y permiten la comprension de conceptos, tales como (entre otros) hegemonia masculina, dominacion masculina, patriarcado, virilidad, masculinidad. En todo caso, los movimientos feministas de los anos 1960-1970 en Canada, Estados Unidos y Francia abren la brecha (dicho propiamente, se constituyen en lo que algunos llaman la “segunda ola” del feminismo) con luchas dotadas de ideologias politicas diversas y variadas. La injusticia y la desigualdad son los tipos genericos de relaciones entre hombres y mujeres que el feminismo (radical) quiere abrogar. En gran medida, es a partir de este proyecto feminista que nace el proyecto masculinista, igualmente con sus avatares y contradicciones y en busqueda de una identidad. Sabiendo que en ciertos contextos la nocion de genero se aborda como una norma, como un estereotipo que hay que deconstruir, en particular el estereotipo de la mujer. En este ensayo desarrollo algunos argumentos que permitan ver un poco mejor las posiciones teoricas, conceptuales, politicas del ser masculino. EnglishGender is undoubtedly one of the most important concepts in social sciences, it refers to a complex system of human relations that takes as research unit interaction between two groups, men and women. Historically, the concept and later gender theory facilitate and enable the understanding of concepts, such as (among others) male dominance, male domination, patriarchy, virility, masculinity. In any case, the feminist movements of the years 1960- 1970 in Canada, USA and France opened the gap (said itself, constitute what some call the “second wave” of feminism) equipped struggles with political ideologies diverse and varied. Injustice and inequality are generic types of relationships between men and women that feminism (radical) wants to destroy. It is largely from this feminist project born the masculinist project, also with their avatars and contradictions and in search of an identity. Knowing that in certain contexts the notion of gender is approached as a rule, as a stereotype to be deconstructed, particularly the stereotyping of women. In this essay development some arguments that let you see a little better theoretical, conceptual, political positions of being male.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.800
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.010
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTrayectorias: revista de ciencias sociales de la Universidad Nacional de Nuevo LeónSame topicSocial Sciences and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207