A novel 94-GHz dipole bow-tie slot antenna on silicon for imaging applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a novel dipole bow-tie slot antenna on silicon substrate operating at 94-GHz for imaging applications. The proposed antenna consists of a differentially fed printed folded dipole cut away from the 0.2-µm aluminum above the 1.2-µm silicon dioxide (SiO2) layer built on the 380-µm thick silicon substrate. To increase the antenna impedance bandwidth, a bow-tie slot is added to the dipole slot antenna. The simulated results show that the proposed dipole bow-tie slot antenna exhibits a 5.3 GHz bandwidth starting from 90.1 GHz to 95.4 GHz with a fractional bandwidth (FBW) of about 5.7% while the dipole slot antenna has a bandwidth of 3.3 GHz starting from 92.1 GHz to 95.4 GHz with a FBW of about 3.5%. The proposed dipole bow-tie slot antenna also has a maximum realized gain of 9.7 dBi, which is better than that of the dipole slot antenna, and sidelobe levels of −9.5 dB in both principle planes compared to that of the dipole slot antenna. The proposed antenna is a good candidate for 94-GHz imaging applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".