MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2540497139 · doi:10.1109/nssmic.2011.6154367

Embedded real time digital signal processing unit for a 64-channel PET detector module

2011· article· en· W2540497139 on OpenAlexaff
Louis Arpin, Konin Koua, Sylvain Panier, Haithem Bouziri, Mouadh Abidi, Mohamed Walid Ben Attouch, Caroline Paulin, Pascale Maille, Charles Geoffroy, Roger Lecomte, J.‐F. Pratte, Réjean Fontaine

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApplication-specific integrated circuitComputer scienceComputer hardwareCMOSDetectorSIGNAL (programming language)Channel (broadcasting)Electronic engineeringEmbedded systemEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent developments in avalanche photodiode (APD) technology have led to the design and fabrication of a new radiation detector module based on an 8 × 8 array of LYSO crystals individually coupled to the pixels of two 4 × 8 monolithic APD arrays. This evolution entails the complete redesign of the data acquisition system to satisfy the 7-fold increase in pixel density relative to a previous implementation of individually read out sensors. As a result, the required digital signal processing cannot be implemented exclusively in FPGAs due to cost, area occupied and power consumption considerations. To comply with this new reality, a 64-channel mixed-signal ASIC, built from TSMC CMOS 0.18 μm technology, has been designed. It uses a Time-over-Threshold (ToT) scheme to extract both energy and timing along with the pixel number. A complex architecture of finite state-machines, driven by a 100 MHz clock, ensures the ASIC real time ToT calculation operations and its proper calibration by an external device. The ASIC can output as much as 2 Mevents/s on its LVDS data transfer dedicated link and consumes around 600 mW. The ASIC was developed following a mixed-signal flow allowing the designers to minimize and to verify the impact of undesirable parasitic effects on both analog and digital ends of the ASIC before sending the layout to the foundry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCCD and CMOS Imaging SensorsFrench-language works237,207