MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2540523754 · doi:10.5663/aps.v6i1.27721

Towards an Urban Aboriginal Housing and Wellness Strategy for Metro Vancouver, 2015-2020

2016· article· en· W2540523754 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Zoë Greig, Tasha Henderson, Justin Wiebe, Meika Taylor

Bibliographic record

Venueaboriginal policy studies · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersAustralian Government
KeywordsEnvironmental planningGeographyTransport engineeringBusinessSociologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Change is coming. The Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) and the BC Representative for Children and Youth have both recently released reports summoning all levels of government, and citizens, to engage with the issues and injustices facing urban Aboriginal peoples across Canada. Securing accessible, adequate, and affordable housing is one of the critical areas of inequality facing Canada's urban Aboriginal peoples. With higher than average growth in population over the last 15 years, the supply of housing and cultural supports for Aboriginal residents in Metro Vancouver falls short. The need for appropriate housing, and a shift in the narrative around the urban Aboriginal population, has never been greater.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.947
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.387 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueaboriginal policy studiesSame topicIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFrench-language works237,207