MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Correlation between hemodynamic parameters and response to high-dose interleukin-2 in metastatic melanoma

2006· article· en· W2540579743 on OpenAlexaff
Janice P. Dutcher, Constantin A Dasanu, Igor Codreanu, Mrilini Yeddu, Harish Muniswamy, Peter H. Wiernik, Doru T Alexandrescu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBlood pressureStatistical significanceInternal medicineDiastoleHeart rateCardiologyHemodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

18012 Background: A direct correlation between the levels of hypotension during IL-2 treatment and response in melanoma has not yet been demonstrated, although both have been correlated with higher IL-2 doses and production of nitric oxide. Methods: A retrospective study analyzed the association between response to IL-2 and systolic, diastolic, mean blood pressure (BP), and heart rate (HR) at baseline and during treatment, by using the t-test. Further, same comparison was performed after BP was corrected for the amount of neosynephrine (neo) utilized during IL-2 treatment (subtracting the raise in BP produced by neo using individual patient coefficients). 22 patients (13 females, 9 males) with a median age of 54 years (range 36–71) received a total of 26 courses of IL-2 (between 2001–2005). Median number of prior treatments was 2.5 (range 0–5). Outcomes were divided in (A) responders (1CR, 3PRs and 4SDs), and (B) non-responders (18PD). Results: When adjusting for the effects of neo, the corrected mean BP during treatment was significantly lower in (A) compared to (B) (52.17 vs 64.34 mmHg, P = 0.018; mean difference −12.17, 95% CI −22.06 to −2.27). Similarly, the decrease in corrected mean blood pressure from baseline was greater in (A) (−34.89 vs −20.67 mmHg, P = 0.003; mean difference −14.22, 95% CI −23.09 to −5.37). A trend towards statistical significance was recorded for the variation in uncorrected mean BP (17.86 vs. 23.22 mmHg, P = 0.085; mean difference −5.36, 95% CI −11.53 to 0.80). Separate analysis demonstrated a significant drop in both systolic (−17.85 mmHg, P = 0.009; 95% −30.77 to −4.91) and diastolic (−12.05 mmHg, P = 0.01; 95% CI −21.02 to −3.07) corrected BP in (A) vs. (B), but no significant difference for either uncorrected parameters. No correlation between response and the HR, number of IL-2 doses or total quantity of neo was observed. Conclusions: Uncorrected variation in mean BP shows a trend towards significance in predicting response to IL-2. However, corrected mean, systolic and diastolic BP correlate closely with response to treatment. Implications of this association may reside in better outcomes for an intensive IL-2 treatment, with aggressive pressor support. A common pathogenetic basis for response to IL-2 and induction of hypotension is possible. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicCancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune ResponseFrench-language works237,207