MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Reproductive stage influences roost use by tree roosting female eastern pipistrelles,<i>Pipistrellus subflavus</i>

2004· article· en· W2540782617 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jacques Pierre Veilleux, John O. Whitaker, Sherry L. Veilleux

Bibliographic record

VenueEcoscience · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBat Biology and Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersIndiana State UniversityBat Conservation International
KeywordsBiologyReproductive successEcologyReproductionReproductive biologyZoologyReproductive strategyHabitatDemographyPopulationPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

:We investigated the effect of reproductive stage (reproductive versus non-reproductive) on summer roost use by adult female eastern pipistrelles. Due to differing selective pressures associated with summer reproductive and non-reproductive stages, we hypothesized that roost tree species and tree characteristics used by adult female eastern pipistrelles would differ depending on the individual’s reproductive stage. Reproductive females preferred roost trees in the genus Quercus, whereas non-reproductive females did not prefer a specific species group. Reproductive females roosted at lower levels in the forest strata, closer to a permanent water source, and farther from the nearest forest/field edge. We stress the importance of recognizing the potential for changes in habitat use by adult female bats during summer months depending on whether individuals are reproductive or non-reproductive. Combining data from reproductive classes of adult females may mask important roost characteristics unique to maternity colonies of bats.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.182
Threshold uncertainty score0.772

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEcoscienceSame topicBat Biology and Ecology StudiesFrench-language works237,207