MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2540839127 · doi:10.1109/icm.2007.4497705

Profiling CAD Tools: A Proposed Classification

2007· article· en· W2540839127 on OpenAlexaff
Jason G. Tong, Mohammed Khalid

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEmbedded Systems Design Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProfiling (computer programming)Computer scienceBottleneckSoftwareCategorizationCADSoftware engineeringData miningMachine learningArtificial intelligenceEmbedded systemOperating systemEngineeringEngineering drawing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Profiling is the analysis of a software program's behaviour as it is executing on a target processor or platform. The purpose is to determine the computational bottleneck so that designers can modify or optimize the software code in order to gain a speed up in overall performance. There is a variety of profiling tools available which provides different measuring techniques and can collect a diverse set of performance information. This paper presents a classification of profiling tools where we categorize each profiler based on its measuring capabilities and the type of performance data that is returned to the desiger. This classification will aid designers in choosing the right profiling CAD tool for their task.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0200.013
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0100.009
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEmbedded Systems Design TechniquesFrench-language works237,207