MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2541238719 · doi:10.1109/jphot.2017.2675401

Stress Engineering With Silicon Nitride Stressors for Ge-on-Si Lasers

2017· article· en· W2541238719 on OpenAlexafffund
Jiaxin Ke, Lukas Chrostowski, Guangrui Xia

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE photonics journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersUniversity of British Columbia
KeywordsPhysicsAlgorithmComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Side and top silicon nitride stressors were proposed and shown to be effective in reducing the threshold current Ithand in improving the wall-plug efficiency ηwpof Ge-on-Si lasers. Side stressors only turned out to be a more efficient way to increase ηwpthan using the top and side stressors together. With the side stressors and geometry optimizations, a ηwpof 34.8% and an Ithof 36 mA (Jthof 27 kA/cm2) can be achieved with a defect limited carrier lifetime (τp,n) of 1 ns. With τp,n= 10 ns, an I th of 4 mA (Jthof 3 kA/cm2) and a ηwp of 43.8% can be achieved. These are tremendous improvements from the case with no stressors. These results give strong support to the Ge-on-Si laser technology and provide an effective way to improve the Ge laser performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE photonics journalSame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207