MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2541243830 · doi:10.1109/iedm.1990.237220

A new charge pumping method for determining the spatial interface state density distribution in MOSFETs

2002· article· en· W2541243830 on OpenAlexafffund
X.M. Li, M. Jamal Deen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor materials and devices
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSimon Fraser University
KeywordsMOSFETInterface (matter)Channel (broadcasting)Distribution (mathematics)Charge (physics)Charge densityMeasure (data warehouse)VoltageState (computer science)Electronic engineeringComputer scienceElectrical engineeringConstant (computer programming)OptoelectronicsTopology (electrical circuits)Computational physicsMaterials sciencePhysicsAlgorithmMathematicsEngineeringTransistorMathematical analysisData miningMoleculeQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel charge pumping technique is proposed for measuring the spatial distribution of interface state density N/sub it/ in MOSFETs. Instead of connecting the source and the drain together as is usually done, different reverse bias voltages are applied to the source and the drain separately. The method makes it possible to measure the distribution of N/sub it/ without making any assumptions about it. With this method, one can determine N/sub it/ distribution near the source and the drain of the channel independently. Results show that the interface state distribution of a virgin MOSFET is not constant along the channel.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.495
Threshold uncertainty score0.292

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSemiconductor materials and devicesFrench-language works237,207