Między przeznaczeniem a wolnym wyborem. Przygodność człowieka w filozofii Alberta Schweitzera
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The world described by science is, according to Schweitzer, terrible despite its greatness. The order of the world remains a mystery to man, and any attempts to justify the sovereignty of man’s will meet the insurmountable barrier of objective determinants of human existence (our birth, imperfect intellect, shortness of life; what limits man as a thinking and active subject).The world of civilisation and culture created by man is also becoming independent of man and opposes man as a hostile force. The ominous consequences of this double contingency may, to some extent, be neutralised by establishing a universal moral signpost that is binding for all people. In Schweitzer’s philosophy, this role is performed by the ethics of reverence for life. The principles, consequences, cohesion, and credibility of his programme of transforming man are the subject of consideration in the article.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it