MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2541502683 · doi:10.18192/rceh.v40i2.1843

“Encajadas las formas”: Avant-garde Material Poetics in Manuel Altolaguirre’s “Poema del agua”

2016· article· es· W2541502683 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Zachary Rockwell Ludington

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Canadiense de Estudios Hispánicos · 2016
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicComparative Literary Analysis and Criticism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPoeticsPoetryLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este ensayo analiza el “Poema del agua” de Manuel Altolaguirre con especial interés en las posibilidades metafóricas que implican la labor tipográfica del poeta y el legado poético y material de los movimientos de vanguardia que le precedieron. Teniendo en cuenta la importancia de los parámetros materiales e históricos que definen el momento de producción de cualquier texto literario y especialmente el énfasis de todas las vanguardias en lo material, una lectura tipográfica del “Poema del agua” ofrece una nueva y muy fructuosa aproximación a la poesía de Altolaguirre y de otros poetas de la Generación del 27. A través de esta lectura tipográfica, que descubrirá nuevas coordenadas exegéticas para la poesía de Altolaguirre, se hará manifiesta la presencia de las innovaciones metafóricas de escritores vanguardistas como Ramón Gómez de la Serna y Gerardo Diego en la poesía española posterior al tumulto artístico que fue la primera vanguardia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.014
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Canadiense de Estudios HispánicosSame topicComparative Literary Analysis and CriticismFrench-language works237,207