MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2541809568 · doi:10.1109/acssc.2011.6190076

Maximum likelihood time delay estimation for Direct-Spread CDMA multipath transmissions using importance sampling

2011· article· en· W2541809568 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmed Masmoudi, Faouzi Bellili, Sofiène Affes

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDirection-of-Arrival Estimation Techniques
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultipath propagationComputer scienceEstimatorAlgorithmDelay spreadCramér–Rao boundCode division multiple accessMaximum likelihoodAntenna arrayUpper and lower boundsMaximum likelihood sequence estimationEstimation theoryElectronic engineeringAntenna (radio)StatisticsTelecommunicationsMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we address the problem of time delay estimation for Direct-Spread CDMA (DS-CDMA) multipath transmissions. We observe that the attractive post-correlation model (PCM) of the despread data allows for exploiting results provided in array signal processing and we introduce a new time delay estimator based on the maximum likelihood (ML) criterion. The new technique finds the global maximum of the compressed likelihood function in an efficient way using the importance sampling (IS) technique. Simulation results show that the new estimator provides very good performance in challenging cases of very closely-spaced delays even with a single antenna and transmitted symbol. The Cramer-Rao lower bound (CRLB) for multipath delays is also provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDirection-of-Arrival Estimation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207