MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2541966385 · doi:10.4000/travailemploi.6917

Stratégies patronales de rénovation du dialogue social dans les années 1970

2016· article· fr· W2541966385 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTravail et emploi · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsSt. Clair College
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Au début des années 1970, la direction de l’établissement toulousain de la Société nationale industrielle aérospatiale (Snias) souhaite procéder à une transformation des pratiques en matière de relations sociales. Pour ce faire, elle recourt à un certain nombre de dispositifs visant à modifier le rapport de forces avec les syndicats et à marginaliser le syndicalisme CGT et CFDT au profit de l’approche réformiste développée par la CGT-FO, la CGC ou la CFTC, organisations plus favorables à la politique contractuelle portée par l’entreprise. Pour permettre cette rénovation sociale, la direction s’appuie sur des procédés répressifs et/ou discriminants qui ont pour conséquence d’affaiblir rapidement et durablement l’axe revendicatif au sein de l’établissement. Dans cet article, nous décrivons les stratégies directes et indirectes utilisées par la direction pour parvenir à un apaisement durable des relations sociales dans les usines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.551
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it