Stratégies patronales de rénovation du dialogue social dans les années 1970
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au début des années 1970, la direction de l’établissement toulousain de la Société nationale industrielle aérospatiale (Snias) souhaite procéder à une transformation des pratiques en matière de relations sociales. Pour ce faire, elle recourt à un certain nombre de dispositifs visant à modifier le rapport de forces avec les syndicats et à marginaliser le syndicalisme CGT et CFDT au profit de l’approche réformiste développée par la CGT-FO, la CGC ou la CFTC, organisations plus favorables à la politique contractuelle portée par l’entreprise. Pour permettre cette rénovation sociale, la direction s’appuie sur des procédés répressifs et/ou discriminants qui ont pour conséquence d’affaiblir rapidement et durablement l’axe revendicatif au sein de l’établissement. Dans cet article, nous décrivons les stratégies directes et indirectes utilisées par la direction pour parvenir à un apaisement durable des relations sociales dans les usines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".