MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2542015126 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2004.1404005

Optical Mapping System for Recording Action Potential Durations in Adult Mouse Left and Right Atrium

2005· article· en· W2542015126 on OpenAlexaff
Anders Nygren, Alan Lomax, Wayne R. Giles

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicElectrochemical Analysis and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrophysiologyOptical mappingRight atriumLeft atriumAtrium (architecture)Optical recordingAction (physics)Atrial action potentialInternal medicineCardiologyBiologyNeuroscienceBiomedical engineeringMedicineComputer sciencePhysicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increasing availability of murine models of the cardiovascular system has created a need for instrumentation and methods for assessing murine cardiovascular function. We have adapted an existing optical mapping system based on voltage-sensitive dyes to record from an isolated mouse atrial preparation. Initial results indicate that our approach is capable of recording action potentials from isolated mouse atria with sufficient signal quality to determine action potential duration (APD). Preliminary observations suggest that gradients in APD exist in the mouse atria and are similar to those observed in the atria of larger mammals. Future work with this technique will provide important information about mouse atrial electrophysiology and how it relates to that of larger mammals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectrochemical Analysis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207