MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2542120863 · doi:10.1109/icu.2006.281509

Timing Acquisition of Ultra-wideband Signals in the Presence of Clock Frequency Offset

2006· article· en· W2542120863 on OpenAlexaff
S. Khalesehosseini, John Nielsen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltra-Wideband Communications Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceFrequency offsetMultipath propagationOffset (computer science)Carrier frequency offsetDetectorSynchronization (alternating current)Ultra-widebandElectronic engineeringWidebandDwell timeUTC offsetClock synchronizationTime–frequency analysisReal-time computingAlgorithmOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingChannel (broadcasting)TelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper is concerned with timing acquisition for ultra-wideband (UWB) communication systems operating in a dense multipath environment with a modest clock frequency offset (CFO). A low complexity maximum likelihood acquisition scheme based on a practical energy detector is considered in this paper where the dwell time for observing the signal at a given trial offset is fixed. This dwell time interval is subdivided into a number of coherent integration subintervals (CIS) with the outcomes of the subintervals accumulated on a noncoherent basis. The detection performance is analyzed as a function of the number of subintervals which provides a means of optimizing the synchronization algorithm given parameters of the typical CFO and input SNR that will be encountered. Simulation results are provided based on the IEEE 802.15.3a CM3 channel model

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.247

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUltra-Wideband Communications TechnologyFrench-language works237,207