MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2542390625 · doi:10.1109/icm.2011.6177381

Formal verification of Time-Triggered Ethernet protocol using PRISM model checker

2011· article· en· W2542390625 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Time Synchronization Technologies
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceEthernetModel checkingEthernet over SDHProtocol (science)Ethernet flow controlATA over EthernetNetwork interface controllerEmbedded systemPrismState (computer science)Synchronous EthernetComputer networkReal-time computingAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Time-Triggered Ethernet (TTE) protocol is becoming widely used in safety-critical environments where failures cannot be tolerated. In this paper, a PRISM model for a TT-Ethernet is proposed based on its specification. A set of TTE properties is proposed as well. Finally, using PRISM model checker, a formal model is proposed in the form of a finite state machine. Using this approach, we were able to identify one faulty state within the network that might cause massive damage to a real-life application, thus revealing a possible weak point in Time-Triggered Ethernet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.848
Threshold uncertainty score0.339

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it