MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2542433746 · doi:10.1182/blood.v104.11.703.703

Enoxaparin Is Effective and Safe as Bridging Anticoagulation in Patients with a Mechanical Prosthetic Heart Valve who Require Temporary Interruption of Warfarin because of Surgery or an Invasive Procedure.

2004· article· en· W2542433746 on OpenAlexaff
Alexander G. G. Turpie, James D. Douketis

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineWarfarinSurgeryThrombosisLow molecular weight heparinAnticoagulantCohortAnesthesiaCardiologyInternal medicineAtrial fibrillation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Enoxaparin is a low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) that is widely used in patients with an acute coronary syndrome and venous thromboembolism. However, there is concern about its use in patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valve because of recent reports of fatal TE occurring in pregnant women with a mechanical heart valve who received long-term enoxaparin, instead of warfarin, during pregnancy. Patients and Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study to assess the efficacy and safety of enoxaparin as bridging anticoagulation in a consecutive patients with a mechanical prosthetic heart valve who required temporary interruption of warfarin therapy because of an elective surgical or other invasive procedure. Patients had warfarin interruption and bridging anticoagulation based on a standardized peri-operative protocol and underwent clinical follow-up for 3 months after surgery. We determined the incidence and associated 95% confidence interval (CI) during the follow-up period for the following outcomes: major bleeding; arterial thromboembolism (stroke, rtansient ischemic attack, systemic embolism, valve thrombosis); all-cause death. Results: There were 174 patients included in this cohort (100 males; mean age: 67±10 years; mean weight: 76±16 kg; 115 with a mechanical aortic valve; 59 with a mechanical mitral valve or combined mechanical aortic and mitral valves) who received bridging anticoagulation with subcutaneous enoxaparin, 1 mg/kg twice-daily. No patient was lost to follow-up. Warfarin therapy was interrupted 5.7±2.2 days before the procedure. The mean number of doses of enoxaparin (1 mg/kg) administered before the procedure was 5.7±1.4 doses. After the procedure, warfarin was resumed on the evening or the next day after the procedure, and the mean number of doses of enoxaparin administered was 6.0±2.2 doses. After 3 months of clinical follow-up, 4 patients developed non-fatal major bleeding (2.3%; 95% CI: 0.06–5.7), 4 patients died (2.3%; 95% CI: 0.06–5.7), and 1 patient had a non-fatal stroke (0.56%; 95% CI: 0.01–3.1). There were no episodes of valve thrombosis or systemic embolism. Conclusions: Enoxaparin appears to be effective and safe as bridging anticoagulation in patients with a mechanical prosthetic heart valve who require temporary interruption of warfarin therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicCardiovascular Issues in PregnancyFrench-language works237,207