MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2542623541 · doi:10.1073/pnas.1610433113

GSDMB induces an asthma phenotype characterized by increased airway responsiveness and remodeling without lung inflammation

2016· article· en· W2542623541 on OpenAlexaff
Sudipta Das, Marina Miller, Andrew Beppu, J. Mueller, Matthew D. McGeough, Christine N. Vuong, Maya R. Karta, Peter Rosenthal, Fazila Chouiali, Taylor A. Doherty, Richard C. Kurten, Qutayba Hamid, Hal M. Hoffman, David H. Broide

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAsthma and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsAsthmaInflammationGene knockdownAirwayImmunologyLungTransgeneEpitheliumBiologyMedicineCell biologyGeneInternal medicinePathologyGeneticsAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significance Because the SNP linking chromosome 17q21 to asthma is associated with increased gasdermin B (GSDMB) expression, we generated transgenic mice expressing increased levels of the human GSDMB transgene (hGSDMB Zp3-Cre ), which develop an asthma phenotype characterized by a spontaneous increase in airway responsiveness and airway remodeling (increased peribronchial smooth muscle) in the absence of the development of airway inflammation. These results challenge the current paradigm in asthma that airway inflammation induces smooth muscle remodeling and airway responsiveness, as these hGSDMB Zp3-Cre mice develop increased airway-hyperresponsiveness and smooth muscle in the absence of airway inflammation. Furthermore, this study adds to our understanding of gene networks in asthma that we have identified can act in sequential pathways (i.e., GSDMB induces 5-lipoxygenase to induce TGF-β1).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.273
Threshold uncertainty score0.207

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations210
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSame topicAsthma and respiratory diseasesFrench-language works237,207