MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2542644551 · doi:10.1109/idt.2009.5404148

An electrical field sensor for micro/nano particles detection applications

2009· article· en· W2542644551 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed F. Ibrahim, Fahmi Elsayed, Yehya H. Ghallab, Wael Badawy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrofluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChipCMOSLab-on-a-chipNanotechnologyNano-Materials scienceIntegrated circuitBiochipComputer scienceElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringEngineeringOptoelectronicsMicrofluidics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an electrical field sensor, which can be used in both biomedical applications and cell characterization. The Lab-on-Chip contains two main parts: 1) A CMOS Lab-on-Chip integrated Circuit (IC) which is based on 0.18 µm technology and includes the sensing and actuation parts, 2) a printed circuit board which contains the amplifications and conditioning parts. Experimental result shows that the automated Lab-on-Chip is a good candidate for biomedical applications, such as in the DNA analysis, to detect the radius of the DNA molecule, and in cancer research area, to help in selecting the suitable antibody for cancer treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.694
Threshold uncertainty score0.243

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrofluidic and Bio-sensing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207