De Garengeot Hernia: A Case of Incarcerated Femoral Hernia Containing the Appendix
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: De Garengeot hernias are defined by the presence of the vermiform appendix within a femoral hernia. The incidence of such hernias is low and their pre-operative diagnosis is challenging. Case Presentation: An 85-year-old Caucasian female presented to the hospital with three-day history of tender and erythematous inguinal mass. A computed tomography (CT) scan of the area showed a hernia sac containing a tubular structure resembling the appendix. The patient was taken to the operating room for exploration of the inguinal mass with the goal of managing the hernia and its contents. At surgery, the diagnosis of a De Garengeot hernia was made. Here we discuss the diagnostic and surgical approaches to treating this patient. Conclusion: The majority of De Garengeot hernias present in the context of incarcerated femoral hernia. The pre-operative diagnosis of this type of hernia is challenging and CT imaging is the most effective modality to make the diagnosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".